Clinical Integration of Automated Processing for Brain Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Multi-Site Reproducibility and Single-Site Robustness.

TitleClinical Integration of Automated Processing for Brain Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Multi-Site Reproducibility and Single-Site Robustness.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsSpincemaille P, Liu Z, Zhang S, Kovanlikaya I, Ippoliti M, Makowski M, Watts R, de Rochefort L, Venkatraman V, Desmond P, Santin MD, Lehéricy S, Kopell BH, Péran P, Wang Y
JournalJ Neuroimaging
Volume29
Issue6
Pagination689-698
Date Published2019 11
ISSN1552-6569
KeywordsBrain, Brain Mapping, Gray Matter, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, White Matter
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of the brain has become highly reproducible and has applications in an expanding array of diseases. To translate QSM from bench to bedside, it is important to automate its reconstruction immediately after data acquisition. In this work, a server system that automatically reconstructs QSM and exchange images with the scanner using the DICOM standard is demonstrated using a multi-site, multi-vendor reproducibility study and a large, single-site, multi-scanner image quality review study in a clinical environment.

METHODS: A single healthy subject was scanned with a 3D multi-echo gradient echo sequence at nine sites around the world using scanners from three manufacturers. A high-resolution (HiRes, .5 × .5 × 1 mm reconstructed) and standard-resolution (StdRes, .5 × .5 × 3 mm ) protocol was performed. ROI analysis of various white matter and gray matter regions was performed to investigate reproducibility across sites. At one institution, a retrospective multi-scanner image quality review was carried out of all clinical QSM images acquired consecutively in 1 month.

RESULTS: Reconstruction times using a GPU were 29 ± 22 seconds (StdRes) and 55 ± 39 seconds (HiRes). ROI standard deviation across sites was below 24 ppb (StdRes) and 17 ppb (HiRes). Correlations between ROI averages across sites were on average .92 (StdRes) and .96 (HiRes). Image quality review of 873 consecutive patients revealed diagnostic or excellent image quality in 96% of patients.

CONCLUSION: Online QSM reconstruction for a variety of sites and scanner platforms with low cross-site ROI standard deviation is demonstrated. Image quality review revealed diagnostic or excellent image quality in 96% of 873 patients.

DOI10.1111/jon.12658
Alternate JournalJ Neuroimaging
PubMed ID31379055
PubMed Central IDPMC6814493
Grant ListS10 OD021782 / OD / NIH HHS / United States
R01 NS105144 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R21 EB024366 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States
R01 NS095562 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 NS090464 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA181566 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Related Institute: 
MRI Research Institute (MRIRI)

Weill Cornell Medicine
Department of Radiology
525 East 68th Street New York, NY 10065